Warning: Creating default object from empty value in /nfs/c03/h07/mnt/56080/domains/filtercoffee.nationalinterest.in/html/wp-content/themes/canvas/functions/admin-hooks.php on line 160

The Kabul Park Residence attacks

India’s short term option — don’t flinch.

Today, six Indians died in suicide attacks perpetrated by the Taliban at the Park Residence and other guesthouses in Kabul, Afghanistan.  This included Indian consulate staff, an ITBP constable and two Indian army officers.  At least five other individuals were injured in the attack, including five Indian army officers.

This blog, along with others, has in the past articulated what India must do in Afghanistan to protect its national interests.  In the August 2008 edition of Pragati, Sushant K Singh argued in favor of a larger Indian military presence in Afghanistan and warned of the long term consequences were India to rely exclusively on “soft power.”  In January 2010’s Pragati, I put forth a case for India to train the Afghanistan National Army (ANA), thereby assisting in raising a credible unit to act as a bulwark against the Taliban and Pakistan’s military-jihadi complex.  Commentators like Harsh Pant have opined that India must stop hedging its bets on the US and must work with other actors like Russia and Iran to engage all sections of Afghan society.

However, despite repeated attacks against Indians and Indian interests in Afghanistan, Manmohan Singh’s government appears disinclined to readjust its Afghanistan strategy.  Today’s attack will not likely force a rethink on how to engage with Afghanistan either.  Given India’s self-imposed shackles and the likelihood of continued attacks against Indian soft targets in the war ravaged nation, India has but one option at its disposal in the short term, and that is to not flinch.

Attacks such as these may lead to calls for India’s level of engagement in Afghanistan to be reconsidered.  However, downgrading Indian presence in Afghanistan is the surest way to convey to the military jihadi complex (MJC) that it can force Indian action through terror.  The MJC feels that it is at an advantageous position:  it has outlasted the Americans,  reinserted itself (and the Taliban) into Afghanistan’s political space and the top leadership of the Quetta Shura — despite the capture of Abdul Ghani Baradar and Mohammed Younis — remains mostly intact. The MJC will enjoy a tremendous psychological boost from the notion that it forced the Americans and the Indians to withdraw from Afghanistan.  It will seek to replicate the model by imposing severe costs on India in Kashmir and the mainland.

It is wrong to suppose that India’s involvement in Afghanistan is merely about power projection and easy access to energy rich Central Asia.  India is facing an existential battle and denying the MJC “strategic depth” in Afghanistan is a critical component to India’s own internal security. Therefore, if India insists in not altering its ill-conceived stance vis-a-vis hard power in Afghanistan, it must at the very least maintain its investment profile in the country, while fully expecting to be targeted repeatedly and frequently by the MJC.  Only the Indian government can explain how this is a better alternative to the introduction of Indian hard power in Afghanistan.

It is significant that India’s reconstruction efforts have earned it tremendous goodwill in Afghanistan.  An opinion poll () conducted in Afghanistan in January 2010 by BBC/ABC/ARD indicated a 71% favorable view of India, as opposed to 15% favorable view of Pakistan.  In the meduim- to long run, India must work with the US, regional actors and Afghans across the political gamut and ensure that an effective and credible counterweight to the MJC and the Taliban is sustained in Afghanistan.

Related posts:

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

6 Responses to The Kabul Park Residence attacks

  1. Umesh February 26, 2010 at 5:50 pm #

    It is an obvious fact that India is fighting a war, although not officially. This is more paradoxical in afghanistan considering the fact , that, we are supposed to help developmental activities. But, the casualties belie this belief.

    In a war-like situation independent of casualties, it is time to show the hard India. Let us continue with our efforts. Our presence needs to remain strong in afghanistan .

    I dont afghanistan returning to the post-1991 period with Taliban becoming powerful. I hear reports that, an army and an airforce is being created. The new afghanistan will be substantially different from the earliar period.

    P.S. Bollywood might be a huge influence. Hell, even in peak war conditions, ‘Khuda Gawah’ was shot somewhere near kabul for a short period inlate 80’s. Perhaps, it can be leveraged now.

  2. Balaji February 26, 2010 at 8:17 pm #

    this goodwill hunting is dubious. we are in afghanistan becos, we have an obligation to help afghans hounded by Pakistan to gain strategic depth against us. we may not get anything from our involvement. neither shud we expect.

    as I mentioned here and elsewhere, sending a SAARC force, which effectively gives Pakistan control over Pashtun areas is one solution.

    india’s attempt to outwit Pakistan in Afghanistan in the short term is only raining indian blood.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Shovels are insufficient | Dao's City for Blog - March 5, 2010

    […] attack on Indian officials in Kabul on February 26th was no ordinary one—it was almost certainly an operation ordered by […]

  2. | The Acorn - March 29, 2010

    […] before trying to sup with Mullah Omar’s outfit. If the Taliban were so keen to engage India, attacking Indian officials in Kabul would be exactly the opposite of what they would do. There’s not only a big gulf […]

  3. Zabiullah talk, Taliban walk | Dao's City for Blog - April 8, 2010

    […] before trying to sup with Mullah Omar’s outfit. If the Taliban were so keen to engage India, attacking Indian officials in Kabul would be exactly the opposite of what they would do. There’s not only a big gulf […]

  4. Link Digest: June 18, 2010 | The Filter Coffee - June 18, 2010

    […] Engage America’s Friends on Afghanistan | G Parthasarathy: An appeal to the U.S. on engaging India in Afghanistan; My own advice to the Indian government would read somewhat different. […]

Leave a Reply