Warning: Creating default object from empty value in /nfs/c03/h07/mnt/56080/domains/filtercoffee.nationalinterest.in/html/wp-content/themes/canvas/functions/admin-hooks.php on line 160

Burning the Quran is a bad idea

Turn up the heat on Terry Jones.

News media in the U.S. is inundated with reports about Terry Jones, the pastor from Gainesville, Fla., whose church, the Dove World Outreach Center,  intends to burn copies of the Quran on the ninth anniversary of 9/11.  Visible support for Dr. Jones is limited (unsurprisingly) to the likes of Ann Coulter, who once said, “we should invade [Muslim] countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity.”

Thankfully, saner voices have come out in condemnation of what Dr. Jones and his church propose to do.  Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called the pastor’s plans “distasteful,” while commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, Gen. David Petraeus advised against burning the Quran.  Even former Alaska governor, Sarah Palin, who spent much of August 2010, campaigning against the construction of the Park 51 mosque near Ground Zero, asked the pastor to “stand down.” Social networking sites such as Facebook have been awash with supporters and opponents alike. Understandably, this is an emotive issue.

But the question here is not about freedom of expression.  Were it so, this would have been an open and shut case.    Dr. Jones’s objectives and the manner in which he seeks to execute them confirm that he is less keen on testing the boundaries of constitutionally guaranteed freedoms than he is on  inciting a particular community.

I do not disagree that Dr. Jones and his group have the “right” to burn the Quran.  I am also less interested at this point in the narratives of tolerance and morality. However, American citizens and the U.S. government ought to be concerned about how such acts will be perceived in the Islamic world.  Acts such as these, could potentially incite violence against U.S. citizens or U.S. interests, including its embassies and companies, in other parts of the world.  These could be perpetrated in countries where the U.S. is not directly engaged in war, and by people who would not normally be perceived by the U.S. as combatants.  There is no reason any of them should suffer on behalf of Dr. Jones or his political motivations.

This also has the potential to inflame passions against minority communities in the U.S. itself, similar to those incidents that occurred in the immediate aftermath of September 11, 2001, where there was a spike in racially motivated attacks in the U.S.

The State Department has sent cables to U.S. diplomatic posts internationally instructing ambassadors to emphasize that the event, if it does go through, does not reflect the views of the U.S. government.  State Department spokesperson P.J. Crowley hoped that these actions would be seen as those of “a small fringe group.”  News media commentators in the Islamic world, however, have no time for such nuances, largely because they would be against their own interests.  This event, if it goes through, will be painted as having been blessed by the White House — many in the Islamic world will not want to see a difference between Terry Jones and Barack Obama. In fact, as if on queue, Nawa-i-waqt already unleashed a preemptive editorial (اردو) on the issue.

In an offline conversation, my INI colleague JK pointed to me this quote from Heinrich Heine — “when they burn books, they will ultimately also burn people.”  Very apt, I thought, and advise that Dr. Jones and his church will hopefully heed.

 

Related posts:

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

5 Responses to Burning the Quran is a bad idea

  1. Balaji September 9, 2010 at 5:41 am #

    in other news, the Prime Minister of the country and many of its top leaders burn an effigy of Raavan at a public ceremony in ‘Ramlila’ grounds every year …

  2. Plato September 9, 2010 at 12:33 pm #

    I agree with you completely. The pastor may have the right to burn the book but it would be a deplorable act primarily because it has the potential to cause harm to American interests and also because people like the pastor represent a form of bigotry in America.

    Having said that I would like to say that, whether rationally or irrationally, the pastor is doing the “dirty work” of raising a lot of questions. B. Raman is doing the “dirty work” of contrasting this issue with that of Cordoba House Project and you are doing the “dirty work” of pointing it out in the twitter feed. Thanks for the link.

    I am just wondering how much time will the mainstream media put between the book burning issue and providing the contrast which B.Raman did.

  3. Ashish Deodhar September 10, 2010 at 2:42 am #

    I agree with you. I think this whole thing is a big comical farce and the sooner it’s over the better for all of us.

  4. history_lover September 14, 2010 at 1:56 am #

    The NawaiWaqt editorial was typical joshila one asking onPresident Obama to make efforts to stop the pastor otherwise the President will be held responsible.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Not your gradma’s al-Qaeda | The Filter Coffee - September 12, 2012

    […] The film is being promoted by controversial pastor, Terry Jones, who was involved in the very public burning of the Quran, two years to the day of these recent […]

Leave a Reply