Warning: Creating default object from empty value in /nfs/c03/h07/mnt/56080/domains/filtercoffee.nationalinterest.in/html/wp-content/themes/canvas/functions/admin-hooks.php on line 160

A system of neglect

India doesn’t need more ideas in tackling its internal security challenges; it needs action.

Another terrorist attack in a major Indian city this week left 16 dead and over 50 injured. Yet, within hours of the attack, India’s elected leaders were busy passing the buck and hypothesizing on the intent and “color” of the terrorist attack before a formal investigation had even begun.

There is something sadly predictable about all of this; the incident in Hyderabad itself — going by the dilapidated state of India’s internal security apparatus — and the indulging in parochial rhetoric thereafter that our leaders find so irresistible. Shouting free-for-alls followed when Pune and Varanasi were hit in 2010, and when Mumbai and Delhi were hit in 2011. Yet, not one terror case since 2008 has been solved. While our internal security agencies battle for their own credibility and relevance in the absence of strong political leadership, the cycle of terror continues.

In response to the attacks on Mumbai in 2008, the government set up the NIA, whose mandate could, at best, be described as confused.  India’s “FBI-style” agency, meanwhile, hasn’t produced the results to even remotely warrant a comparison with the FBI. Centre-State issues have stalled essential progress on NATGRID and the NCTC.  And internal security at the Centre continues to be the part-time responsibility of the Home Minister, whose other responsibilities include areas as varied as dealing with Centre-State issues and the implementation of the provisions of the Official Languages Act.

Can Indian citizens really harbor any expectations of reasonable safety and security when there is such abominable neglect on issues related to national security? India’s internal security apparatus is rotting. And this rot is merely a microcosm of a much larger problem that India faces, which is that there is systemic institutional atrophy in varied velocities across the country. The aspiring India of 2013 has government institutions built to govern an India of the 1940s. Where there are incidents that expose these very apparent gaps, we apply short-term Band-Aids when our institutional structures are falling apart at their very core.

Let’s be candid: India does not need any more ideas on how to tackle internal security challenges. Most of these ideas exist in public domain today. They have already been articulated in reports commissioned by the Central and State governments of India themselves. The Kargil Review Committee (KRC) report in 2001, for example, put forward recommendations in reforming our intelligence agencies. On the heels of the KRC report, a Group of Ministers report under the chairmanship of LK Advani proposed structural changes in intelligence and police reform.

The Ram Pradhan Committee Report — as yet not made public — commissioned by Maharashtra in response to the 26/11 attacks, highlighted critical gaps in coordination and execution of response to an ongoing terror incident. The National Police Commission issued eight reports between 1979 and 1981 on police reform and measures to prevent political interference. The Padmanabhaiah Committee report in 2000 recommended significant structural reforms to policing in India. Further, various states have set up their own commissions to study police reform since the 1960s.

So the ideas for reforming our internal security are already there. What India needs is meaningful action, which can only come about through structural reform (sustained by the continued application of political will) to bring our internal security apparatus into the 21st century. If ideas are needed anywhere, it is perhaps in trying to determine how to politically “sell” these essential changes.

K Subrahmanyam, perhaps India’s greatest post-Independence strategic thinker, once said that India’s leaders weren’t interested in national security, but in the politics of national security. While entirely divorcing “politics” from national security might not be practical, given the realities of India today, the political class’ response to terror cannot be restricted to trading accusations, applying Band-Aid solutions and commissioning reports.  India’s citizens cannot be held hostage to perfunctory political reactions to every terror attack on Indian soil.  The ideas are there, as is the mandate from the people of India.  But India’s politicians have been repeatedly found wanting in action.  They must step up or make way for those capable of action.

Related posts:

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

9 Responses to A system of neglect

  1. Rohan Joshi (@filter_c) February 24, 2013 at 9:42 pm #

    Blogpost: A System of Neglect: India doesn’t need ideas in tackling internal security challenges; it needs action http://t.co/QiRPlx8XlN

  2. Abhay Gupta (@Abhay00) February 25, 2013 at 9:08 am #

    RT @filter_c: My take on Hyderabad and terror: India doesn’t need more ideas on internal security, it needs action. http://t.co/QiRPlx8XlN

  3. @buckh2f February 25, 2013 at 9:37 am #

    RT @filter_c: My take on Hyderabad and terror: India doesn’t need more ideas on internal security, it needs action. http://t.co/QiRPlx8XlN

  4. Tejas (@wlvrn_tjs) February 25, 2013 at 6:51 pm #

    RT @filter_c: My take on Hyderabad and terror: India doesn’t need more ideas on internal security, it needs action. http://t.co/QiRPlx8XlN

  5. Rohit Pradhan (@Retributions) February 25, 2013 at 8:50 pm #

    RT @filter_c: Plug: My take on the Hyderabad terror attack; India doesn’t need more ideas on internal security, it needs action. http://t.co/QiRPlx8XlN

  6. Punam Kadam (@PunamKadam) February 26, 2013 at 7:09 am #

    Lets veer away from the politics of national security and get into action argues @filter_c “A system of neglect” http://t.co/2BqQ0Zvjjx

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Damned lies and statistics | The Filter Coffee - March 3, 2013

    […] internal security apparatus.  State and Central internal security agencies are experiencing systemic institutional atrophy.  The NIA — the UPA’s solution to our woes after 26/11 — hasn’t solved a […]

  2. Business as usual | The Filter Coffee - August 7, 2013

    […] India’s political leadership and national security institutions is eroding.  There has been systematic atrophy of existing institutions charged with managing India’s national security.  Worse, vested […]

  3. The field narrows, the noose tightens | The Filter Coffee - August 31, 2013

    […] intelligence and state and central law enforcement agencies continue to suffer from a lack of resources (technical as well as human), funding and coordination.  These are structural challenges that need to be addressed to counter current and future threats […]

Leave a Reply