Nolnah’s Razor: Ascribing incompetence to that which can be adequately explained by malice.
The report of the Abbottabad Commission, which was set up to investigate the May 2011 raid by U.S. special forces that eventually led to the killing of Osama bin Laden and his couriers, was “obtained” and published online by al-Jazeera today. News reports tell us that the 337-page report makes “scathing reading.”
It attributes “culpable negligence and incompetence at almost all levels of government” in Pakistan’s apparent inability to identify that bin Laden was living in a villa located less than a mile away from the Kakul military academy for at least five years and its inability to detect the special forces contingent that traveled from Jalalabad, Afghanistan to Abbottabad to execute the mission to kill or capture bin Laden.
There are a few ways to look at the content and timing of the “leaked” report. First, the report may be scathing in its criticism of government incompetence, but it barely entertains the possibility that official connivance played a role in bin Laden’s ability to evade U.S. pursuit for ten years. Official denials don’t really mean much under the circumstances. For years, Pakistani leaders claimed that bin Laden wasn’t in their country. Gen. Musharraf claimed bin Laden was dead in 2002.
Pakistan has also, for years, denied that Mullah Omar was living in Pakistan. Yet, multiple reports suggest that he is living in Quetta and under the protection of the ISI. The truth will most likely be revealed once the U.S. and its allies leave Afghanistan in 2014, following which Mullah Omar will emerge triumphantly from parts unknown.
Of course, most people in India are accustomed to hearing how persons of interest to them — Dawood Ibrahim, for example — are most certainly not living in Pakistan. For those of us on this side of the barbed-wire fence, the incompetence defense stretches credulity.
There are other interesting parts to the report. On page 337, it concludes (emphasis added):
But finally, no honest assessment of the situation can escape the conclusion that those individuals who wielded primary authority and influence in national decision making bear the primary responsibility for creating the national circumstances and environment in which the May 2, 2011 incident occurred. It is unnecessary to specifically name them because it is obvious who they are. It may be politically unrealistic to suggest “punishments” from them. But as honourable men, they ought to do honourable thing, including submitting a formal apology to the nation for their dereliction of duty. It will be for the people of Pakistan in the forthcoming elections to pass collective political judgement on them. [al-Jazeera]
The last sentence of the concluding paragraph of the report is curious. It apportions blame to those who “wielded primary authority and influence in national decision making,” but concludes by saying that it was for the people of Pakistan to pass a collective judgement on them in the elections. Great, but Pakistanis don’t get to vote for their COAS or DG-ISI. But they do cast votes on their civilian leadership. From where this blogger is standing, the blame being apportioned here almost certainly targets Asif Ali Zardari and the PPP, rather than the Pakistani military establishment.
The other items for consideration pertaining to the release of the report are the timing and source of the alleged leak. The leak occurs at a time when the U.S. is trying to negotiate an honorable exit from Afghanistan with the Pakistan-backed Taliban in Qatar. That the report was leaked by al-Jazeera, a news agency fully owned by the al-Thani family, which, as it happens, also rules Qatar may not be a coincidence.
This “leak” could effectively mean two things. If the U.S. is sufficiently encouraged by the momentum and direction of the talks, it may be well-disposed towards bailing out the Pakistani military establishment from the embarrassment it has had to endure since 2011. The discrete leak of a document via a news agency owned by a U.S. ally, which blames incompetence rather than connivance (the lesser of two evils) while also criticizing a now mostly-irrelevant and ousted political party works well under such circumstances.
If, on the other hand, things aren’t going so well in Doha, the release of a classified report may have been viewed as necessary by some to coax Pakistan into action. It will, of course, embarrass and anger the Pakistani military establishment. More importantly, it will also most certainly complicate relations between Pakistan and Qatar.