Manmohan Singh must meet with Nawaz Sharif in New York.
Even as we begin to fully understand the circumstances that led to the killing of five Indian jawans by Pakistani troops last week, we are informed of yet another Indian soldier succumbing to injuries today from a Pakistani attack on August 5 in J&K’s Samba district.
In New Delhi, Dr. Manmohan Singh has maintained a steely silence (as is his wont) on both incidents. His defense minister made a dog’s meal of the incident in Parliament for which he was so thoroughly pilloried by the opposition that he had to recant his statement the very next day. Meanwhile, opposition parties are engaged in hyperbole and political theatrics with May 2014 in mind. What should have been dealt with at more tactical military level has now morphed into something larger, and unnecessarily so. There are now even ludicrous demands that India recall its high commissioner from Islamabad.
As mentioned in the previous blogpost, LoC attacks by Pakistan are nothing new. Cross-border attacks have continued to increased year-on-year over the past five years, from 31 in 2008 to 108 in 2012. These sorts of attacks are both routine and expected and should have been dealt with as such. The Indian army has a demonstrable track record of being able to deal with these sorts of transgressions. Had the prime minister condemned the attack and issued a timely statement to the effect that the army was on alert to respond to Pakistan’s provocations, he would have ensured that the incident would have been dealt with through appropriate channels. And as long as the Indian army’s mandate to respond in kind to Pakistan’s aggressions along the LoC was not curtailed, an appropriate punitive response would have assuredly been delivered to Pakistan.
Instead, the UPA has bungled badly in its dealing of what should have been a tactical military issue and allowed it to get commingled with the larger, political issue of Pakistan-sponsored terrorism. The prime minister’s over-enthusiastic commitment to a so-called “peace process” with Pakistan (which possibly explains his silence on the killing of Indian troops and the defense minister’s statements) has left him with yet another political mess on his hands. The Pakistanis, themselves, are always happy to oblige in any endeavor that publicizes and promotes visibility of India-Pakistan issues on the world stage, so a latent upping of the ante with Pakistan is of no real value to India. It should be of no surprise to us, then, that Pakistan is behaving the way it is.
The BJP now wants the PM not to meet with Nawaz Sharif in New York on the sidelines of the UNGA in September, but it must realize that its position is untenable. If India wants to see progress on the 26/11 trial in Pakistan and those responsible for it brought to book, is cutting off communication with a man who has, ostensibly, promised to work towards improving ties with India a wise course of action? The question for India isn’t so much whether or not it must talk to Pakistan, but what it should be talking to Pakistan about. On 26/11, some measure of justice was delivered to the victims and their families with the sentencing and hanging of Ajmal Kasab in India, and by the sentencing of David Headley and Tahawwur Rana in the U.S.
Yet, Lashkar-e-Taiba’s leaders and their state-supported backers who financed and supported the attacks in Mumbai continue to evade justice in Pakistan. It is no secret that Nawaz Sharif’s ability to deliver on promises has always been questionable. The last time he attempted to defy the Pakistani army, he was lucky to find himself with a one-way ticket to Jeddah. But India’s options with regard to the 26/11 trial in Pakistan are few and far between.
Therefore, it is appropriate that Dr. Manmohan Singh meet Nawaz Sharif in New York. His message to his Pakistani counterpart should be clear: deliver on the 26/11 trial and we’ll have something to talk about. No progress on the 26/11 trial means no composite dialog, no discussions on J&K and no visit to Pakistan. How Nawaz Sharif elects to go about to the process to bring the 26/11 trial in Pakistan to a satisfactory conclusion is up to him. Potentially, there are fissures between Zaki ur-Rehman Lakhvi, the LeT operational chief who is already in “custody,” and Hafiz Saeed that could be exploited to deliver a result that India will appreciate.
Nawaz Sharif says he wants to improve ties with India. Let’s see if he can translate intent into action.